Un símil de amplia difusión es aquel que plantea que la vida humana se estructura como el ciclo all-natural de las estaciones del año.
It's the another thing that can not be learnt from Some others; and It is additionally an indication of genius, given that an excellent metaphor implies an intuitive notion with the similarity in dissimilars."[fifty one]
“Tu corazón, tambor de tu pecho”: Se expresa el término authentic que es corazón y posteriormente se habla de un tambor, esto para establecer la similitud entre el sonido del primero y el segundo.
Some modern linguistic theories hold that language advanced from the capability of the Mind to generate metaphors that hyperlink steps and sensations to Seems.[5]
By asserting that the planet can be a phase, Shakespeare utilizes factors of comparison amongst the earth and a stage to convey an knowledge about the mechanics of the entire world along with the actions of the individuals inside of it.
La nieve en sus cabellos hablaba de su historia. (Las canas se comparan con la nieve porque ambas son blancas)
За повеќе информации, погледајте ги Условите на употреба.
Метонимија: Фигура на говор со користење на името на едно нешто во однос на различна работа на која е поврзан првиот.
In so carrying out they circumvent the issue of specifying one after the other Every single of the often unnameable and countless attributes; they stay away from discretizing the perceived continuity of encounter and they are As a result closer to working experience and For that reason a lot more vivid and unforgettable."[27]
Fundamento: la semejanza en la posibilidad de hacer buenos y malos usos tanto de la palabra como de la espada.
“Ella tiene ojos de esmeralda”: Se menciona de manera explícita a los ojos y de forma imaginara a la esmeralda para expresar que los ojos de la persona son verdes y bellos como la piedra en cuestión.
“Sus labios son rubíes”: Se establece la clara relación entre los labios de la persona y los rubíes que son rojos y preciosos.
“El océano de tus ojos”: En este caso se establece una similitud entre la profundidad y el color azul del océano con lo profundo de la mirada y el shade azul de los ojos.
In the two sentences, we have been comparing Jordan into a copyright. In the first sentence, the comparison is overt: the copyright is described instantly. But in the second sentence, we metafora suggest that Jordan is definitely the copyright by evaluating his habits (fanning his feathers) to some thing peacocks are recognized for doing.